Abstract Critique ⇒ Untitled Etching
- minniev
- Mentoris Imperator
- Posts: 4594
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:55 am
- Location: Mississippi
- Editing option: Yes, feel free to edit my image
- Contact:
Untitled Etching
Sometimes nature makes its own art- all opinions and suggestions welcome.
"God gave me photography so that I could pray with my eyes" - Dewitt Jones
- LindaShorey
- Mentoris Secundus
- Posts: 1398
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:50 am
- Location: Yakima, WA
- Editing option: Yes, feel free to edit my image
- Contact:
Are they termite tunnels? It's a cool find, but I haven't worked out yet whether I like it. Something niggling my brain about the arrangement, sort of like a border around three sides of the frame, with not a huge payoff in the middle. At first I was thinking it's too ordered, but when I crop and flip, I like it
Have no idea why, sorry.
I do know I'd be fascinated by the discovery (unless it means additional big $$ on the house restoration), and want to shoot it too! I'd love to know your thought processes for the particular compostion you shared, if you have time to discuss.

I do know I'd be fascinated by the discovery (unless it means additional big $$ on the house restoration), and want to shoot it too! I'd love to know your thought processes for the particular compostion you shared, if you have time to discuss.
- Attachments
-
- crop.jpg (265.55 KiB) Viewed 660 times
"What's important in a photograph and what isn't." http://photographylife.com/whats-import ... -what-isnt
- Charles Haacker
- Mentoris Primus
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 7:20 pm
- Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
- Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
- Contact:
I like it. I do rather wonder what it is but I also think that's unimportant (it is an abstract after all). I also like what Linda did with it. I get a sense in your original presentation, Min, that the work is "running out the bottom." By flipping it Linda stops the "leakage." But since abstract art is, um, abstract I tend to think there are no rules, and anything and everything can be valid. It's up to the viewer to decide what the message is, or if there is a message, but conversely the artist may have a specific message to convey. Elsewhere we have been talking about bias in art and art appreciation. My particular bias with this particular work is that I like it better flipped and cropped. I find it more restful that way. The original presentation makes me uneasy with what I perceive as the work gliding out the bottom like blackstrap molasses. But I am not the active artist but the passive viewer. What reaction did Minnie intend? Did she want me to feel uneasy about where the piece was going, flowing thickly down an unseen wall past the bottom of the frame? If that was the intent then it was a success. I want restful, she wants unease.
(Don't catch him this early with insufficient coffee; he gets this way.)

Friends call me Chuck.
This link takes you to my Flickr albums. Please click on any album to scroll through it.
(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

- minniev
- Mentoris Imperator
- Posts: 4594
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:55 am
- Location: Mississippi
- Editing option: Yes, feel free to edit my image
- Contact:
Thanks for the demo and comments, Linda! The cool thing about an abstract is that it sometimes doesn't have a true top or bottom. It is a rotten tree that the bark has fallen off of, in the swamp. I don't really understand it myself but took its picture. I agree it benefits from a crop, but I like it upwards because of what I saw and now can't un-see - a monkey swinging on a vine like a trapeze, and a snake waiting to nip him in the butt on the backswing. They are what called the shots on the composition, rightly or wrongly.LindaShorey wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 2:04 pmAre they termite tunnels? It's a cool find, but I haven't worked out yet whether I like it. Something niggling my brain about the arrangement, sort of like a border around three sides of the frame, with not a huge payoff in the middle. At first I was thinking it's too ordered, but when I crop and flip, I like itHave no idea why, sorry.
I do know I'd be fascinated by the discovery (unless it means additional big $$ on the house restoration), and want to shoot it too! I'd love to know your thought processes for the particular compostion you shared, if you have time to discuss.
"God gave me photography so that I could pray with my eyes" - Dewitt Jones
- minniev
- Mentoris Imperator
- Posts: 4594
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:55 am
- Location: Mississippi
- Editing option: Yes, feel free to edit my image
- Contact:
Thanks Chuck. See my note to Linda which describes my own bizarre visual processing (and anthropomorphization issues) which caused me to orient it and frame it like this. I agree the crop improves it, but I'm still stuck with that damned monkey and the snake that's hot on his tail.Charles Haacker wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:03 pmI like it. I do rather wonder what it is but I also think that's unimportant (it is an abstract after all). I also like what Linda did with it. I get a sense in your original presentation, Min, that the work is "running out the bottom." By flipping it Linda stops the "leakage." But since abstract art is, um, abstract I tend to think there are no rules, and anything and everything can be valid. It's up to the viewer to decide what the message is, or if there is a message, but conversely the artist may have a specific message to convey. Elsewhere we have been talking about bias in art and art appreciation. My particular bias with this particular work is that I like it better flipped and cropped. I find it more restful that way. The original presentation makes me uneasy with what I perceive as the work gliding out the bottom like blackstrap molasses. But I am not the active artist but the passive viewer. What reaction did Minnie intend? Did she want me to feel uneasy about where the piece was going, flowing thickly down an unseen wall past the bottom of the frame? If that was the intent then it was a success. I want restful, she wants unease.(Don't catch him this early with insufficient coffee; he gets this way.)
"God gave me photography so that I could pray with my eyes" - Dewitt Jones
- Charles Haacker
- Mentoris Primus
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 7:20 pm
- Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
- Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
- Contact:
Dang. Now I can't un-see it either!
(Well, there goes the ol' blackstrap...)

Friends call me Chuck.
This link takes you to my Flickr albums. Please click on any album to scroll through it.
(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

- LindaShorey
- Mentoris Secundus
- Posts: 1398
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:50 am
- Location: Yakima, WA
- Editing option: Yes, feel free to edit my image
- Contact:
A fantastic visual, Minnie. Definitely stick with your monkey and snake!
"What's important in a photograph and what isn't." http://photographylife.com/whats-import ... -what-isnt
- Matt Quinn
- Mentoris Maximus
- Posts: 2768
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:12 pm
- Location: MD in winter: Cape Cod in summer
- Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
- Contact:
Two ballerinas dancing in campfire light. Matt
Matt Quinn
"...approach the light as opposed to the subject." Stan Godwin
"...approach the light as opposed to the subject." Stan Godwin
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests